Did D4vd’s Private Investigator Just Expose “Inaccurate Reporting” in the Celeste Rivas Hernandez Case?

Private investigator Steve Fischer, hired by the Hollywood Hills homeowner who leased a property to musician D4vd, is challenging what he describes as “wildly inaccurate reporting” about the ongoing investigation into the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. The teen was found dead inside the trunk of D4vd’s Tesla in July, prompting a highly publicized probe. Fischer’s recent comments on X (formerly Twitter) aim to correct what he says are false claims circulating in the media.

In several posts, Fischer disputed reports shared by TMZ founder Harvey Levin, insisting that multiple statements about the home, the car, and the timeline of events are “flat-out wrong.” His remarks have reignited public debate about the accuracy of early media coverage surrounding the tragedy and the accountability of those involved.

Steve Fischer Challenges Reports About D4vd’s Hollywood Hills Home

Fischer directly contested Levin’s characterization of D4vd’s leased Hollywood Hills residence as a “party house.” According to Fischer, there was only one noise complaint during the artist’s lease — a 2 a.m. call on July 20, 2025, involving four girls waiting outside for an Uber. “I have the body-cam video from that incident,” Fischer wrote, stressing that no other complaints existed. “David Burke entertained guests, but that’s not a crime.”

The private investigator clarified that Burke’s activities were within legal and social norms, noting that the 20-year-old was paying “a large amount” to rent the home and that “entertaining is expected.” Fischer accused several outlets of distorting the situation to create a sensational narrative.

He also pushed back against reports claiming that he identified the Tesla driver based on the “one key” theory. “That’s not true,” Fischer said. “I identified the driver through surveillance footage — the individual wore something highly distinctive that was seen earlier inside the house.” He added that while the homeowner provided one physical key, remote access via Tesla’s app and duplicate keys made the “one key” claim implausible.

Legal Questions and Misconceptions About the Investigation

Fischer further rejected the notion that prosecutors cannot move forward with charges if the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner rules Celeste’s death “undetermined.” He emphasized that a concealment-of-body charge is a separate offense. “That crime happened, full stop,” he stated, asserting that legal accountability must still apply regardless of the manner of death.

He also urged the public to focus on the bigger issue — accountability. “This involves a fourteen-year-old child in the company of adults,” Fischer said. “She was not of age to consent, and they were of age to be held accountable.”

The LAPD has confirmed that the investigation remains active and has not yet named any suspects or established a cause of death. Authorities have urged the public to avoid speculation as forensic analysis continues.

New Timeline Details From the Private Investigator

Fischer shared new insights into Celeste’s background and timeline. He said the teen had been reported missing multiple times before her death — first in February 2024 and again in April. She was later seen alive at a family graduation event in May and even appeared in video footage in September 2024. “The family did not update law enforcement that she was safe,” Fischer claimed, suggesting inconsistencies in how her disappearance was handled.

The revelations complicate the case’s narrative, raising questions about how long Celeste was in contact with adults associated with the Hollywood property. While Fischer avoided naming suspects, his posts imply that multiple individuals may soon face scrutiny as investigators piece together the final timeline of events.

The controversy underscores growing tension between private investigators, media outlets, and law enforcement over narrative control in high-profile cases involving celebrities. D4vd’s name continues to circulate online, though authorities have not linked him to criminal wrongdoing as of now.

FYI (keeping you in the loop)-

Q1: Did D4vd’s private investigator challenge media reports?

Yes. Steve Fischer publicly disputed multiple claims he called “wildly inaccurate,” particularly those made by TMZ’s Harvey Levin.

Q2: What did Fischer say about D4vd’s Hollywood home?

He said it was not a “party house,” citing only one noise complaint and clarifying that D4vd was a responsible tenant.

Q3: How did Fischer identify the Tesla’s driver?

He said he used surveillance footage, not the “one key” theory reported by some outlets.

Q4: Can prosecutors pursue charges if the death is ruled undetermined?

Yes. Fischer explained that concealment of a body is a chargeable offense regardless of cause of death.

Q5: Has D4vd been charged in the case?

No. The LAPD has not named any suspects or linked D4vd to criminal activity as of the latest update.