Apple Accuses Epic Games of Demanding ‘Free Ride’ in Australian Court Battle

A major legal clash is unfolding in Australia. Apple and Epic Games are locked in a high-stakes court fight over the iPhone’s app ecosystem. The dispute centers on whether Apple must allow alternative app stores and payment methods on its devices.

This week, Apple publicly accused Epic of seeking a “free ride” on its platform. According to Reuters, Apple stated it will fight for a ruling that protects its intellectual property and user safety.

Legal Background and the Australian Ruling

Epic Games initially sued Apple in Australia back in 2020. The lawsuit accused the tech giant of violating the country’s competition laws. The core issue was Apple’s prohibition on app sideloading and alternative in-app payment systems.

In August 2025, Australia’s federal court delivered a partial victory for Epic. The court found that Apple’s rules against sideloading did breach the Competition and Consumer Act. However, the judge also acknowledged Apple’s right to be paid for its technology.

Remedies and Potential Market Impact

The court has not yet decided how to fix the anti-competitive behavior. Epic has asked the court to force Apple to permit iPhone sideloading in Australia without any fees. Apple argues this request goes far beyond the court’s initial ruling.

If the court sides with Epic, it could reshape the digital market in Australia. The outcome might mirror changes Apple was forced to make in the European Union under the Digital Markets Act. This would give consumers more choice but could also introduce new security considerations.

The final decision on remedies is not expected until March 2026, ensuring this high-profile Apple Epic Games Australia dispute will continue to be closely watched by regulators and developers worldwide.

Info at your fingertips

What is app sideloading?

Sideloading means installing applications on a device from sources other than the official app store. This would allow users to download apps directly from the internet or third-party marketplaces on iPhones, bypassing Apple’s App Store entirely.

Why does Apple oppose sideloading?

Apple argues that sideloading creates significant security and privacy risks for users. The company says its curated App Store provides vital safeguards that protect consumers from malware, fraud, and data theft.

What was the result of the initial Australian court ruling?

The court found Apple’s anti-sideloading rules violated competition law. However, it also recognized Apple’s right to be compensated for its intellectual property and platform, creating a complex legal landscape for the upcoming remedies hearing.

Could this affect iPhone users outside of Australia?

A ruling forcing Apple to change its business model in Australia could influence regulatory actions in other countries. It might set a legal precedent that other nations could reference in their own antitrust investigations into Apple’s practices.

When will a final decision be made?

The full relief hearing has been scheduled for March 2026. This gives Apple more time to prepare its response to Epic’s proposed remedies. An initial hearing is set for December 2025.