Baker McKenzie Lawsuit Alleges Former Associate Waged Vicious Defamation Campaign

Global law firm Baker McKenzie has filed a defamation lawsuit against a former associate. The suit alleges Brooke Radford made over 100 false social media posts. These posts accused partner Maurice Bellan of sexual assault and the firm of a cover-up.

The original complaint was rejected by the court for including unnamed plaintiffs. A refiled lawsuit now proceeds with only the firm and Bellan as plaintiffs. The case highlights escalating tensions over online allegations in the legal profession.

Disputed Claims and a Personal Relationship Unravel

According to the complaint, the allegations are unequivocally false. The firm states Bellan’s relationship with Radford was strictly professional. It claims he never touched her or showed any inappropriate attention.

The lawsuit suggests a personal motive for the alleged defamation campaign. Radford was reportedly in a two-year relationship with Bellan’s son, Reece. That relationship ended shortly before her termination from the firm.

Baker McKenzie states Radford was fired for misusing a firm credit card. The complaint says she then sought retribution against the “common denominator,” Maurice Bellan. Her online allegations reportedly escalated dramatically over several weeks.

Escalating Allegations and Firm Response

The nature of Radford’s public accusations changed significantly. In late July, she allegedly claimed Bellan offered her $50,000 to have his grandchild. By mid-September, her narrative had shifted to claims of assault and a firm cover-up.

A Baker McKenzie spokesperson affirmed the firm takes harassment claims seriously. They expressed confidence the lawsuit would prove no merit to Radford’s allegations. The firm said it attempted dialogue, but Radford did not engage.

This case places a spotlight on how legal firms manage internal disputes. It also shows the potential fallout from social media allegations. The outcome could influence how similar situations are handled industry-wide.

The Baker McKenzie lawsuit represents a significant legal confrontation over truth and reputation. The firm’s decisive action underscores its commitment to defending its integrity. This case will be closely watched across the legal community.

Info at your fingertips

What is Baker McKenzie suing Brooke Radford for?

The firm is suing for defamation. It alleges Radford made over 100 false posts accusing a partner of assault. The suit claims these posts damaged reputations.

What does Baker McKenzie say about the assault allegations?

The firm calls the accusations unequivocally false. It states the relationship was strictly professional. The complaint denies any inappropriate contact occurred.

Why was Brooke Radford fired from Baker McKenzie?

According to the lawsuit, she was terminated for misusing a firm credit card. The firm cites other performance issues as well. Her dismissal preceded the alleged defamation campaign.

How did the allegations change over time?

Initial posts allegedly involved a $50,000 offer to have a grandchild. Later accusations escalated to claims of sexual assault. The suit details this dramatic narrative shift.

Has Brooke Radford responded to the lawsuit?

Radford has not publicly commented on the refiled complaint. The firm states she has not engaged with its attempts at dialogue. The case proceeds without her formal response.

Trusted Sources

Reuters
Associated Press