Buttigieg Urges Democrats to Champion Trump’s Unfulfilled IVF Coverage Pledge

The crushing financial burden of infertility treatments has derailed parenthood dreams for countless Americans. Now, in a striking political twist, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is pushing Democrats to adopt one of Donald Trump’s abandoned campaign promises: mandatory insurance coverage for IVF. This unexpected move spotlights a rare area of potential bipartisan agreement while highlighting the stark gap between presidential pledges and policy reality.

Speaking on the Pod Save America podcast, Buttigieg endorsed Trump’s 2024 campaign vow to require insurers to cover fertility treatments. “I think it’s good policy,” Buttigieg stated. “If we’re really serious about being pro-family, then we need to make sure that we support that.” His comments come as families nationwide grapple with IVF costs averaging $12,000-$15,000 per cycle—often requiring multiple attempts—according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2024 report).

Why Is IVF Coverage a Critical Issue for American Families?

Infertility affects 1 in 8 U.S. couples, yet insurance coverage remains wildly inconsistent. Only 19 states mandate some fertility treatment coverage, leaving most families facing crippling out-of-pocket expenses. The emotional toll compounds the financial strain: many delay parenthood or abandon hopes altogether. “We shouldn’t scoff at those interested in starting families,” Buttigieg emphasized, noting cost and access barriers are “artificial issues” policymakers can resolve. Experts warn this coverage gap exacerbates inequities—low-income households and minorities face disproportionate hurdles to care.

What Happened to Trump’s IVF Promise?

During the 2024 campaign, Trump vowed to expand IVF access, branding himself the “fertilization president.” In February 2025, he signed an executive order directing the Domestic Policy Council to “reduce out-of-pocket costs” for treatments. Yet six months later, a Washington Post investigation (August 2025) found “the White House has no plan to mandate IVF care.” When pressed, spokesperson Abigail Jackson insisted the administration is “committed like none before” to fulfilling Trump’s pledge but provided no timeline or specifics. Critics argue the order lacks enforcement teeth, leaving insurers voluntary discretion.

The Political Path Forward for Fertility Care

Buttigieg’s endorsement signals a strategic pivot for Democrats toward kitchen-table issues. “Supporting families shouldn’t be partisan,” he argued, urging policies that “encourage people to have kids if they want to.” His stance reflects growing voter demand: 76% support expanded IVF coverage (RESOLVE, 2025). Still, legislative hurdles remain. While Democrats could introduce a federal mandate bill, Republican resistance to insurance regulations persists.

As IVF costs keep parenthood out of reach for millions, Buttigieg’s challenge spotlights a policy failure transcending party lines. Lawmakers must convert campaign rhetoric into tangible support—contact your representatives to demand action on affordable family-building options now.

Must Know

Q: How much does IVF cost without insurance coverage?
A: A single IVF cycle averages $12,000-$15,000, with medications adding $3,000-$6,000. Most patients need multiple cycles, pushing total costs over $50,000 according to ASRM data.

Q: What did Trump’s IVF executive order actually do?
A: Signed February 2025, it directed the Domestic Policy Council to “explore options” for reducing costs but included no coverage mandates or funding. Experts note it lacks enforcement mechanisms.

Q: Why does Buttigieg support this Republican proposal?
A: He calls it a pragmatic “pro-family” solution to help Americans facing financial barriers to parenthood, urging Democrats to prioritize policy over partisanship.

Q: Which states currently mandate IVF coverage?
A: Nineteen states have varying mandates, including Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. Most cap coverage cycles or exempt small businesses (RESOLVE, 2025).

Q: Could IVF coverage gain bipartisan support?
A: Public polling shows overwhelming cross-party backing. However, disputes over insurance mandates and embryo policies could complicate legislation.