A leading economist states that caste-based discrimination has significantly hampered India’s economic potential for centuries. This argument was central to a high-level debate on the country’s reservation policy. The discussion featured on India Today’s ‘Candid, Constructive Conversations’ platform.

Economist and former parliamentarian Narendra Jadhav presented the historical economic case. He directly linked social hierarchy to national progress. According to India Today, Jadhav argued that caste discrimination is the primary reason for India’s slowed growth over two millennia.
Reservation Policy Debated as Remedy and Divisive Force
The conversation examined whether affirmative action has worked. Panelists discussed if it has fulfilled its goal of social justice. They also questioned if it now perpetuates the very divisions it aimed to heal.
Author Dr. Suraj Yengde challenged traditional notions of merit. He argued that true merit cannot exist in a caste-structured society. This perspective questions the foundation of many criticisms against reservation policies.
Social activist Gaurav Jaiswal provided concrete examples. He shared stories of individuals whose lives were transformed by reservation. This illustrated the policy’s direct, positive impact on social mobility.
Balancing Historical Justice with Contemporary Efficacy
The debate also covered the policy’s original intent. Advocate Siddharth Shankar Dubey noted its design as a temporary measure. This point fuels ongoing discussions about its duration and future evolution.
The economic argument adds a new dimension. Framing caste discrimination as an economic hindrance shifts the conversation. It moves beyond pure social justice to include tangible national development costs.
This analysis suggests profound long-term consequences. Excluding talent from vast population segments stifles innovation and productivity. The panel explored how remedying this could unlock future growth.
The core assertion that caste discrimination has slowed India’s economic growth reframes a persistent social issue as a critical national development challenge. This perspective may influence future policy debates.
Thought you’d like to know
What did Narendra Jadhav say about caste and the economy?
He stated clearly that caste discrimination has “undoubtedly slowed down India’s economic growth over a long period of time.” He attributes a major historical economic lag directly to this social system.
What was the main topic of the India Today debate?
The debate focused on India’s caste-based reservation policy. Experts discussed its historical context, current effectiveness, and impact on both social justice and national progress.
Did anyone defend the reservation policy?
Yes. Social activist Gaurav Jaiswal provided ground-level examples of its positive impact. He shared stories showing how reservation has enabled upward mobility for disadvantaged groups.
Was the concept of “merit” discussed?
Absolutely. Author Dr. Suraj Yengde questioned the idea of merit in a caste-based society. He argued that the playing field has never been level, making traditional meritocracy a flawed concept.
Was reservation always meant to be permanent?
No. Advocate Siddharth Shankar Dubey pointed out the policy’s original temporary intent. Its continuation is a central point of contemporary political and social debate.
How does caste affect economic growth?
By systematically excluding large segments of the population from education and opportunity, a nation fails to utilize its full human capital. This limits innovation, productivity, and overall economic potential.
iNews covers the latest and most impactful stories across
entertainment,
business,
sports,
politics, and
technology,
from AI breakthroughs to major global developments. Stay updated with the trends shaping our world. For news tips, editorial feedback, or professional inquiries, please email us at
[email protected].
Get the latest news and Breaking News first by following us on
Google News,
Twitter,
Facebook,
Telegram
, and subscribe to our
YouTube channel.



