Former supermodel Christie Brinkley has ignited a heated conversation about the future of marriage after suggesting that couples should treat the institution more like a renewable contract. Speaking on the Are You a Charlotte? podcast, Brinkley shared her belief that marriage is an “outdated concept” and proposed a radical alternative: reassessing and renewing vows every five years—or walking away without the legal entanglements of divorce.
The comments come from a celebrity whose own relationship history has been closely followed by the public. Brinkley, now 71, has been married four times, with each marriage ending in divorce. While her modeling career and public image have long made her a household name, her latest remarks have positioned her squarely in the center of a cultural debate about commitment, tradition, and modern love.
What Did Christie Brinkley Say About Marriage?
During the podcast, Brinkley suggested that couples could “check in” every five years to decide if they want to continue the relationship, rather than feeling bound by lifelong vows.
“You could get married, like, ‘We’ll see if you want to renew it in five years,’” Brinkley said. “Every five years, go, ‘Do you want to renew?’ That way, if you’re getting bored or whatever, you can get out of it without all the lawyers and all that stuff.”
While she framed the idea as a way to reduce the financial and emotional toll of divorce, critics have argued that such an approach undermines the deeper meaning of holy matrimony—traditionally viewed as a lifelong commitment not just between two people, but often in a religious sense, between a couple and God.
Why the Idea is Sparking Backlash
Brinkley’s comments have been met with sharp criticism from both religious leaders and marriage advocates. Many believe her approach mirrors the short-lived nature of many celebrity relationships and fails to address the effort and perseverance needed to maintain a long-term partnership.
Marriage counselors note that communication, mutual respect, and conflict resolution—not contractual expiry dates—are the cornerstones of lasting unions. Dismissing marriage as outdated, they argue, may send the wrong message to younger generations already navigating declining marriage rates and shifting social values.
The pushback also reflects a broader distrust of celebrity advice on deeply personal topics. Critics point out that Hollywood has a notoriously high divorce rate and that many entertainers may not be the most credible voices on sustaining lifelong commitments.
The Bigger Conversation: Is Marriage Really Outdated?
While Brinkley’s comments may seem extreme, they highlight an ongoing global discussion about how marriage fits into modern life. Research from multiple sociology studies shows that marriage rates have been declining steadily over the last few decades in many Western countries. Factors include changing gender roles, economic pressures, and evolving definitions of partnership.
Still, in many cultures and communities, marriage remains a cornerstone institution. Religious traditions, legal protections, and family stability continue to make it a powerful social framework. According to family law experts, marriage as a legal contract provides critical rights and responsibilities that cannot be replicated by a casual agreement.
Expert Analysis: What’s at Stake
Psychologists warn that framing marriage as something easily “renewable” could create a mindset of disposability. When relationships are treated like short-term agreements, partners may be less motivated to work through challenges.
“Commitment thrives when both partners see it as binding and enduring,” explains Dr. Laura Bennett, a licensed marriage and family therapist. “If people view marriage as temporary, they might be quicker to abandon it at the first sign of trouble.”
At the same time, supporters of Brinkley’s idea argue that it could help people avoid toxic, loveless, or unhealthy marriages without the lengthy and costly process of divorce. In their view, a set review period might encourage couples to be more intentional about their relationship choices.
Whether viewed as a provocative social experiment or an alarming sign of shifting values, Christie Brinkley’s ‘marriage renewal’ concept is stirring strong reactions from all sides. As the debate continues, one thing is certain—our cultural definition of commitment is being tested in real time.
You Must Know
Q: What exactly did Christie Brinkley propose about marriage?
A: She suggested treating marriage like a renewable contract, with couples deciding every five years whether to renew their commitment or part ways without legal complications.
Q: Why are people criticizing Christie Brinkley’s idea?
A: Critics argue it undermines the meaning of lifelong commitment and could weaken the stability marriage traditionally provides for couples and families.
Q: How many times has Christie Brinkley been married?
A: Brinkley has been married four times, with each marriage ending in divorce.
Q: Is marriage declining in popularity?
A: Yes, statistics show marriage rates are falling in many Western nations, influenced by cultural, economic, and social changes.
Q: Could a renewable marriage contract work legally?
A: While prenuptial and postnuptial agreements exist, no widespread legal framework supports automatic renewal clauses in marriage law.
