Danica Patrick Slams NFL’s Selection of Bad Bunny for Super Bowl Halftime Show

Former NASCAR driver Danica Patrick has publicly criticized the NFL’s decision. She objects to Bad Bunny headlining the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show. The high-profile event will occur in Santa Clara, California.

Patrick voiced her strong disapproval on social media platform X. Her comments have sparked a wider discussion about the selection. According to The New York Post, she specifically took issue with the performer’s use of Spanish.

Patrick’s Social Media Critique Goes Viral

Patrick stated that songs not in English should not be allowed. She called the Super Bowl one of America’s highest-rated television events. Her post quickly gained traction online.

She also reshared a controversial claim about the artist. This post labeled Bad Bunny a “demonic Marxist.” Patrick is known for her open political stances.

She recently campaigned for former President Donald Trump. This context adds a political dimension to her criticism. The rapper has previously expressed concerns about ICE agents at his concerts.

NFL Executive Defends Historic Halftime Choice

The league is standing firmly behind its decision. NFL Executive Jon Barker released a supportive statement. He praised Bad Bunny’s global influence and cultural significance.

Barker highlighted the artist’s ability to bridge languages and audiences. He called Bad Bunny one of the most streamed artists worldwide. The league expects an unforgettable performance.

Following the announcement, Bad Bunny shared his own reaction. He said the performance is for his people, culture, and history. This marks a significant moment for Latin music on the world’s biggest stage.

The debate over the Bad Bunny Super Bowl halftime performance highlights evolving cultural norms. It underscores the NFL’s push for a more global audience. This selection promises one of the most talked-about shows in recent memory.

Thought you’d like to know

What did Danica Patrick say about Bad Bunny?

She argued that songs not in English should not be allowed at the Super Bowl. Patrick called it one of America’s premier television events. Her comments were made on social media.

How did the NFL respond to the criticism?

An NFL executive defended the choice enthusiastically. Jon Barker cited Bad Bunny’s global energy and cultural vibrancy. He said the artist’s connection with fans will deliver an unforgettable show.

Why is Bad Bunny’s selection significant?

It represents a major step for Latin music on a global platform. He is one of the most streamed artists in the world. His performance will bridge languages and genres for a massive audience.

Has Bad Bunny commented on the performance?

Yes, he made a brief statement after the announcement. The rapper said the show is for his people and culture. He views it as a celebration of their history.

What was the political context of Patrick’s criticism?

Patrick has been openly supportive of former President Donald Trump. She reshared a post with strong political labels. This added a partisan layer to the cultural debate.