Erika Kirk Lawsuit Against Whoopi Goldberg Debunked: Viral $90M Claim Fact-Checked

Viral social media posts claim Erika Kirk is suing Whoopi Goldberg. These allegations surfaced on Facebook in recent days. They describe a multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit.

The story is completely false. No such legal action has been filed. Fact-checking organizations have already flagged these claims as fabricated.

Examining the False Viral Allegations

One popular Facebook post alleged a $90 million lawsuit. It claimed Kirk sued Goldberg for creating a false adultery scandal. The post referenced a hug between Kirk and JD Vance.

Another version inflated the figure to $110 million. This claim accused Goldberg of twisting a compliment into an intellectual property dispute. Both narratives are fictional.

According to Reuters, no court records support these allegations. The story appears to have been manufactured by unverified accounts. Its purpose seems to be generating engagement through controversy.

How the Fabrication Gained Traction

The false claims exploit a real, recent tragedy. Erika Kirk’s husband, Charlie Kirk, was a prominent political figure. His death was a significant news event.

Mixing this real context with a sensational lie made the story believable to some. Social media algorithms then amplified the posts. This created a cycle of misinformation.

The story also resurfaced a previously debunked claim. An old falsehood about Goldberg calling Kirk a “Barbie” reappeared. Snopes had already fact-checked this as untrue.

The Erika Kirk lawsuit story is a confirmed fabrication. It underscores the need for verifying information before sharing. Always consult reputable news sources for accurate reporting.

Info at your fingertips

Is Erika Kirk actually suing Whoopi Goldberg?

No, she is not. There is no evidence of any lawsuit. The story is a complete fabrication with no basis in fact.

Where did the lawsuit claim originate?

It started on unverified Facebook profiles. These accounts shared the false narrative to generate clicks and engagement.

Have any fact-checkers addressed this story?

Yes, platforms like Snopes have previously debunked similar claims. The new viral posts are a repackaging of old misinformation.

What was the alleged lawsuit amount?

Posts variably cited $90 million or $110 million. These figures were invented as part of the false story.

Why do people believe these false claims?

They mix real people with fictional events. This blending of fact and fiction can make the stories seem plausible to uncritical readers.