Federal Judges Block Trump Administration’s Attempt to Suspend SNAP Benefits

Two federal judges have blocked the Trump administration from suspending critical food aid. The rulings were issued on Friday in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. They prevent the suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for millions of Americans.

The judges ordered the government to use contingency funds to continue payments. This decision comes amid an ongoing government shutdown that began on October 1. According to Reuters, the lawsuits argued the suspension would cause immediate and irreparable harm.

Judges Rule Against Unprecedented Benefit Cut

Judge John McConnell in Providence and Judge Indira Talwani in Boston issued their rulings within minutes of each other. They found the administration’s plan to halt November benefits was unlawful. The U.S. Department of Agriculture had claimed it lacked funds to continue the program.

The USDA argued it needed Congress to pass a spending bill to end the shutdown. However, plaintiffs successfully pointed to other available funding sources. This includes a $5.25 billion contingency fund specifically for program operations.

Wider Implications for Low-Income Americans

The court decisions protect assistance for approximately 42 million people. SNAP benefits cost between $8.5 and $9 billion per month. The suspension would have been an unprecedented halt to the nation’s primary anti-hunger program.

This ruling ensures low-income families, seniors, and disabled individuals retain food security. The legal action highlights the use of contingency funds during budgetary impasses. It sets a significant precedent for future government shutdown scenarios.

The federal judges’ intervention ensures vital SNAP benefits continue uninterrupted, safeguarding food access for vulnerable populations during a period of political uncertainty.

Info at your fingertips

What is the SNAP program?

SNAP stands for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. It provides food-purchasing assistance for low-income individuals and families in the United States. The program is a critical part of the national social safety net.

Why did the Trump administration want to suspend benefits?

The administration cited a lack of funds due to the government shutdown. Officials claimed they lacked authority to pay benefits without a congressional spending bill. They argued the suspension was a necessary fiscal measure.

What other funding did the judges identify?

The rulings pointed to a $5.25 billion contingency fund for program operations. Plaintiffs also identified a separate fund containing approximately $23 billion. These resources were deemed sufficient to maintain benefit payments.

Who are the judges who issued these rulings?

Judge John McConnell serves on the United States District Court for Rhode Island. Judge Indira Talwani serves on the United States District Court of Massachusetts. Both were appointed by former President Barack Obama.

How many people rely on SNAP benefits?

Approximately 42 million low-income Americans depend on SNAP for food assistance. The program costs between $8.5 and $9 billion per month to operate. It represents one of the largest federal welfare programs.