From Page to Screen: 5 Stephen King Adaptations That Changed Too Much

Stephen King’s books have inspired countless films. Some adaptations become classics. Others take creative liberties that frustrate loyal readers. Several recent and older movies have made controversial changes to King’s original stories. These changes often alter character fates and core plot points.

These deviations can undermine the source material’s intent. Fans and critics alike have noted these significant departures. Here are five notable Stephen King adaptations where the changes missed the mark.

Radical Departures From the Source Material

Some films bear little resemblance to King’s work. A prime example is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man.” The original short story involves a mythical satyr and a possessed lawnmower. The film turned it into a sci-fi story about virtual reality.

This change was so drastic that Stephen King sued to have his name removed. The film kept only the title and a character’s name. According to reports from The Guardian, the legal battle highlighted the adaptation’s infidelity.

Another major misfire was 2017’s “The Dark Tower.” It attempted to condense an eight-book series into one 95-minute film. The movie merged elements from the first and third books. It also omitted crucial characters like Eddie and Susannah Dean.

This confused both new viewers and book fans. The messy timeline failed to capture the epic scope of King’s magnum opus. It was a disappointing attempt to bring a complex universe to the screen.

Character Endings That Missed the Point

Character deaths are pivotal in King’s narratives. Changes here can alter a story’s entire meaning. In the novel “The Shining,” Jack Torrance experiences a moment of redemption. He helps his family escape before the Overlook Hotel explodes.

Stanley Kubrick’s 1980 film changed this ending completely. Jack simply freezes to death in the hedge maze. This removed the character’s tragic arc of regained humanity. King himself has expressed dissatisfaction with this cinematic choice.

A similar issue occurs in 2019’s “It Chapter Two.” Stan Uris’s suicide is a tragic moment in the book. It stems from sheer terror at Pennywise’s return. The film adaptation suggested it was a strategic sacrifice to motivate the group.

This reinterpretation cheapened the act’s horror. It transformed a moment of personal defeat into a plot device. Many readers felt this undermined the story’s emotional weight.

Info at your fingertips

Which Stephen King adaptation changed the most from the book?

“The Lawnmower Man” (1992) is considered the most radically different. The film shares almost nothing with the original short story besides the title. Stephen King successfully sued to have his name disassociated from the project.

Why did Stephen King dislike Kubrick’s ‘The Shining’?

King felt the film neglected the novel’s core themes of family and addiction. He criticized Jack Nicholson’s performance as being “crazy from the first scene.” The altered ending that removed Jack’s redemption was a key point of contention.

Are there any Stephen King adaptations he likes?

Yes. King has publicly praised several adaptations. These include “Stand by Me,” “The Shawshank Redemption,” and the 1990 miniseries of “It.” He has also commended more recent films like “Doctor Sleep.”

What was wrong with ‘The Dark Tower’ movie?

The film tried to compress a long, complex series into a single movie. It omitted major characters and plotlines. The result felt rushed and unsatisfying to most fans and critics.

How does ‘Cell’s’ ending differ from the book?

The novel ends bleakly with the protagonist trying to “cure” his infected son with another phone pulse. The 2016 film uses a “it was all a dream” illusion trope, which many found to be a weak and cliché conclusion.

Faithful adaptations honor the author’s vision. The best Stephen King adaptations understand what makes his stories resonate. They balance cinematic needs with the source material’s soul.