Tradepoint Atlantic Dredging Push Aims to Protect Local Waterways

Community leaders in Maryland are demanding a change in dredging plans for the Sparrows Point waterfront. They insist that developer Tradepoint Atlantic must use hydraulic dredging to protect the Patapsco River and Chesapeake Bay. The call to action was announced by the Sparrows Point North Point Historical Society. A press conference is scheduled for Thursday in Fort Howard.

The group fears that mechanical dredging could stir up dangerous industrial waste. This waste is a legacy of the area’s long history of steelmaking. They argue that hydraulic dredging is a safer, more precise method that would prevent an environmental disaster.

New Soil Samples Reveal Hidden Toxins at Coke Point

Recent environmental testing has intensified these concerns. According to the historical society, new bore samplings taken at Coke Point show elevated toxin levels. These contaminants were found just five feet below the surface. This discovery suggests a significant pollution threat is closer to the surface than previously known.

Community advocates claim they have documented proof that Tradepoint Atlantic is not fully disclosing these findings. They also question recent changes to the company’s dredge material containment site. A 12-foot revision to the original plan, they argue, should have required a new permit and public review.

Legal Action Looms as Environmentalists Vow to Protect Restoration Progress

The potential impact on the Chesapeake Bay is a central point of contention. Environmentalists say a mistake could undo more than 50 years of restoration work. The health of local fisheries and water quality for surrounding communities hangs in the balance. The Patapsco River Basin is a critical tributary to the already vulnerable Chesapeake.

If Tradepoint Atlantic does not agree to switch to hydraulic dredging, the community coalition is prepared to seek a court injunction. Their goal is to halt any activity until their environmental safety demands are met. This sets the stage for a potential legal battle over the future of the Sparrows Point redevelopment.

The dispute highlights a growing national conflict between industrial redevelopment and environmental justice. The outcome of this demand for hydraulic dredging could set a important precedent for how similar projects are handled in environmentally sensitive areas across the United States.

Info at your fingertips

What is the difference between mechanical and hydraulic dredging?

Mechanical dredging uses clamshell buckets to scoop material from the bottom. Hydraulic dredging uses pumps to slurry the material, which is considered a more controlled and less disruptive method.

Why is Sparrows Point considered environmentally sensitive?

The site has a long history of steel production, leaving behind industrial waste. It is also located directly on the Patapsco River, which flows into the ecologically critical Chesapeake Bay.

Who is leading the demand for hydraulic dredging?

The effort is led by the Sparrows Point North Point Historical Society, along with community and environmental advocates. They announced their position in a recent press release.

What are the specific toxins of concern?

While the exact toxins were not listed in the release, historical steelmaking waste often includes heavy metals like lead and arsenic, as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

What is the goal of seeking a court injunction?

An injunction would legally force Tradepoint Atlantic to stop its dredging work. This would allow time for a court to review the environmental concerns and community demands.