Indian Billionaire Harsh Goenka Counters Peter Navarro’s “Brahmins Profiteering” Claim

White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro blamed “Brahmins” for profiteering in India. He made the remark to justify a new US tariff policy. His comments have sparked significant outrage online.

Indian industrialist Harsh Goenka issued a sharp public rebuttal. He challenged Navarro’s claims with a detailed post on social media.

Navarro’s Controversial Justification for Tariffs

Navarro discussed a 50% tariff on Indian imports. The tariff was imposed by former US President Donald Trump. He claimed “Brahmins” were profiting at the expense of the Indian people.

This is not the first time he has made such a statement. According to Reuters, the repeated nature of the remarks amplified the controversy. The comments were perceived as a mischaracterization of India’s economic structure.

Goenka’s Fact-Based Rebuttal Goes Viral

Harsh Goenka, chairman of the RPG Group, responded directly. His witty tweet quickly gained traction online. He listed major Indian corporate giants to counter Navarro’s argument.

“Dear Peter Navarro, India’s boardrooms aren’t run by Brahmins. Tata? Not Brahmin. Reliance? Not Brahmin. Mahindra? Not Brahmin. Wipro? Not Brahmin. Birla? Not Brahmin,” Goenka wrote. He then highlighted the community’s contributions to science and the military.

He also took a subtle dig at Navarro’s previous advocacy for a Nobel Prize for Trump. Goenka stated Indian Brahmins earned their honors “only through merit.” He signed the tweet, “An Indian (not a Brahmin).”

Social Media Erupts in Support

The online response was overwhelmingly supportive of Goenka. Many users praised his bold and factual stance. One user called the post “gutsy” and wished other leaders would speak up.

Another user appreciated the Nobel Prize reference. They noted that the clever jibe would likely “hurt him greatly.” The incident has become a major talking point in business and political circles.

The online clash underscores the sensitivity of international trade rhetoric. It also highlights the power of factual counterarguments. The Peter Navarro Brahmins remark has clearly backfired, uniting critics across the globe.

Info at your fingertips

What did Peter Navarro say about Brahmins?

Peter Navarro stated that “Brahmins are profiteering” at the expense of Indian people. He used this claim to justify imposing a 50% tariff on Indian goods imported into the US.

How did Harsh Goenka respond?

Harsh Goenka listed major Indian companies not run by Brahmins. He also highlighted the community’s contributions to India’s military and scientific achievements, countering Navarro’s narrative.

What was the 50% tariff on?

The tariff was imposed on imports from India. It was a policy move by the former US administration aimed at restructuring trade relationships.

How did social media react?

Social media users widely praised Goenka’s response. Many called it bold, factual, and a necessary correction to Navarro’s mischaracterization.

Trusted Sources: Reuters, Hindustan Times