Katy Perry Lawsuit Seeks $5 Million from Veteran in Montecito Mansion Dispute

Katy Perry is pursuing nearly $5 million in damages from a disabled veteran. The dispute involves a $15 million Montecito, California mansion. The singer purchased the property from Carl Westcott in 2020.

The legal battle began after Westcott attempted to back out of the sale. He claimed he was impaired by painkillers during the signing. A judge already ruled in Perry’s favor, validating the sale.

Court Ruling Upholds Validity of the Real Estate Contract

In May 2024, a judge confirmed the sale was legally binding. The court found Westcott was of sound mind when he signed. According to the ruling, he presented no persuasive evidence of incapacity.

This ruling solidified Perry’s legal ownership of the estate. It also opened the path for her to claim additional financial compensation. The case has now moved to the damages phase.

Breakdown of the Multi-Million Dollar Damage Claims

Perry’s legal team filed new documents detailing the losses. They are seeking $4.7 million for lost rental income. This figure accounts for the property’s potential earnings during the extended litigation.

An additional $1.3 million is claimed for necessary repairs. The total demand stands at just over $4.8 million. Legal documents reviewed by the Daily Mail outline these specific financial requests.

Westcott’s legal team has countered these claims. They argue that the financial obligations should actually flow in the opposite direction. The veteran’s lawyers maintain that Perry owes their client money.

Thought you’d like to know

What is the total amount Katy Perry is seeking?

Katy Perry is seeking a total of $4,868,401.95. This includes nearly $4.7 million for lost rental income. The remainder covers repair costs for the Montecito mansion.

Why did Carl Westcott try to cancel the home sale?

Carl Westcott claimed he was weakened by painkillers when he signed the contract. He argued this impaired his judgment. The court ultimately rejected this claim, upholding the sale.

When did the judge rule in favor of Katy Perry?

The judge ruled in Perry’s favor in May 2024. The ruling stated Westcott was of sound mind during the signing. This decision validated the original real estate contract from 2020.

How has the litigation affected the property?

The extended legal dispute prevented the property from being rented out. This resulted in significant lost income claims. Necessary repairs also accumulated during this period.

What is Westcott’s current response to the damage claims?

Westcott’s legal team disputes the damage claims. They argue that Perry actually owes money to their client. The financial aspects of the case remain highly contested.