Marcos Family Open to Lifestyle Check as Sandro Marcos Faces DPWH Funding Scrutiny

The Philippine presidential palace has stated it would not oppose an inquiry into the wealth of the nation’s first family. This follows a recent investigative report highlighting government funding directed to the congressional district of the president’s son. The announcement signals a rare moment of potential public transparency for the politically dominant Marcos clan.

The development comes amid lingering public questions about political dynasty influence and the fair use of national funds. According to the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), the district represented by Congressman Sandro Marcos was a top recipient of certain infrastructure budgets.

Palace Stance Follows Investigative Report on DPWH Allocations

Presidential Communications Office Undersecretary Claire Castro publicly addressed the possibility of a lifestyle check. She stated there is no legal barrier to such an investigation into the family of President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. The comment was made directly in response to media questions about the PCIJ’s findings.

The PCIJ report analyzed Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) data from 2023 to 2025. It identified the 1st District of Ilocos Norte, represented by Sandro Marcos, as among the top beneficiaries of allocable infrastructure funds. This district is a long-established political stronghold for the Marcos family.

Sandro Marcos Volunteers for Independent Commission Probe

In response to the growing scrutiny, Congressman Sandro Marcos has taken a proactive step. Undersecretary Castro confirmed that the young lawmaker volunteered to face an investigation. He specifically offered to appear before the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) to address the allegations.

“He said he will go to the ICI himself so he can be investigated,” Castro explained. She added that his office is simply awaiting a formal schedule from the commission. This move is being closely watched as a test of accountability for a prominent political figure.

President Marcos Jr. Defers to Son, Trusts His Response

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has been briefed on the matter. The Palace confirmed he has read the full PCIJ report concerning his son’s district. However, the President has chosen not to intervene directly in the public discussion surrounding the funding issue.

Castro relayed that President Marcos trusts his son’s capability to handle the situation appropriately. “The President knows Congressman Sandro Marcos understands what he is doing and knows how to respond,” she stated. This reflects a deliberate strategy of allowing the congressman to manage his own political challenges.

The Marcos family’s openness to a lifestyle check is a direct reaction to a report on DPWH fund allocations. The voluntary investigation of Sandro Marcos will be a significant public test for the family’s commitment to transparency and accountability in Philippine politics.

Info at your fingertips

What is a lifestyle check in Philippine politics?

A lifestyle check is an official investigation into a public servant’s assets and spending. It aims to verify if their standard of living aligns with their declared salary and lawful income. These checks are a common anti-corruption tool, though their effectiveness can vary.

What did the PCIJ report find about Sandro Marcos?

The PCIJ report analyzed DPWH budget data from 2023 to 2025. It found the 1st District of Ilocos Norte was a leading recipient of allocable infrastructure funds. Sandro Marcos has been the congressional representative for that district during this period.

How has Sandro Marcos responded to the allegations?

Congressman Marcos has volunteered to be investigated by the Independent Commission for Infrastructure. His office stated he is ready to appear before the commission and simply needs a scheduled date for the proceedings to begin.

What is the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI)?

The ICI is a government body tasked with overseeing and evaluating the national infrastructure program. It is designed to provide an independent review of projects, policies, and potential issues related to public works spending and implementation.