Maryland Residents Challenge BGE Power Lines in Critical PSC Hearings

Homeowners in Maryland are taking a stand against a major utility project. Seven residents from Harford and Baltimore Counties will testify before state regulators this week.

They oppose BGE’s plan to build 29 miles of new high-voltage transmission lines. The hearings begin today and will determine the project’s future.

Property Rights and Environmental Concerns Fuel Opposition

The core legal argument involves property deeds from 1931. Homeowners claim these old deeds only grant BGE rights for a single power line.

They argue that building a completely new line is an illegal trespass. This case could set a significant precedent for utility easements.

Environmental risks are a major worry for the community. The proposed route cuts through Gunpowder Falls State Park.

It also traverses the sensitive Chesapeake Bay Critical Area. Opponents cite threats to local ecosystems and water quality.

Public safety fears include electromagnetic field exposure. There are also concerns about increased wildfire hazards in rural corridors.

Eleven proposed monopoles reportedly exceed FAA height standards near Fallston Airport. This adds another layer of regulatory complication.

Political and Financial Stakes Escalate for BGE Project

Local government bodies have voiced strong opposition. The Baltimore County Council passed a unanimous resolution in 2024.

It urged BGE to bury the lines, especially in parkland. According to Reuters, the utility made no meaningful design changes in response.

The project’s cost has reportedly doubled since its 2024 announcement. This financial increase is a central point of contention for ratepayers.

Maryland residents would ultimately bear this cost through higher electric bills. The economic burden is a key argument for project opponents.

The case highlights a broader energy policy debate for the state. The project aims to replace power from a retiring coal plant with energy from Pennsylvania.

Critics argue this increases Maryland’s dependence on out-of-state power. They advocate for more investment in local, in-state energy generation instead.

The outcome of these PSC hearings will directly impact Maryland’s energy future and set a critical precedent for community-led opposition to major infrastructure projects. The BGE power lines decision is one to watch closely.

Info at your fingertips

What is the Brandon Shores Retirement Mitigation Project?

The BSRM Project is BGE’s plan to construct 29 miles of new transmission lines. It is designed to import power from Pennsylvania to replace energy from the retiring Brandon Shores Power Plant. The project’s cost has reportedly doubled since its initial proposal.

Why are residents opposed to the new power lines?

Residents cite property rights, environmental damage, and public health concerns. They also fear decreased property values and potential wildfire risks. The project’s route through a state park is a major point of contention.

What is “limited intervenor status”?

This legal status allows the seven property owners to formally participate in the PSC hearings. It grants them the right to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and make legal arguments. This gives their concerns an official platform in the regulatory process.

How have local governments responded to the project?

The Baltimore County Council passed two unanimous resolutions against the project’s current design. The Harford County Council is also reviewing a similar measure. These actions show significant political opposition to BGE’s plans.

When will a final decision be made?

The Maryland Public Service Commission hearings run through October 17. A final ruling from the state regulators is expected after reviewing all testimony and evidence. There is no public timeline for the final decision announcement.

Trusted Sources: Associated Press, Reuters, local government documents