Navy Admiral Rejects Claim About Controversial US Boat Attack

A top US Navy admiral has denied explosive allegations about a deadly military strike. Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley told lawmakers he received no “kill them all” order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The closed-door briefing on Thursday addressed a controversial follow-on attack in the Caribbean.

Congress is now investigating whether that second strike violated the laws of war. The operation targeted a vessel suspected of drug trafficking. According to the Associated Press, the incident has thrown the Pentagon and Capitol Hill into significant turmoil.

Lawmakers Divided After Viewing Classified Strike Footage

The September 2nd operation was the first in a series of missile strikes. The Trump administration ordered these strikes against suspected drug-running boats near Venezuela. More than 80 people have been killed in approximately 20 such actions so far.

The specific incident under review involved a follow-on attack. Admiral Bradley authorized this strike on survivors from the initial engagement. The Washington Post reported this claim, though Bradley disputes the characterization.

Legal experts told the Associated Press this could breach international law. Targeting individuals who are no longer combatants is a potential violation. This legal grey area is central to the congressional inquiry.

Broader Implications for Military Authority and Oversight

The controversy touches on presidential war powers. Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how these strikes were authorized. President Donald Trump initiated the campaign without explicit congressional approval.

Republicans largely defend the military’s actions. Senator Tom Cotton said he was “gratified” the US was taking the battle to cartels. He argued the survivors seemed to be trying to stay in the fight.

Democrats emerged from the briefing deeply concerned. Representative Adam Smith described two “shirtless people clinging to the bow” of a wrecked boat. He stated they were killed by missiles despite being in clear distress.

The congressional investigation into the Caribbean strike is gaining momentum. Key lawmakers demand all related documents and the full video evidence. This probe into the alleged “kill them all” order will test military accountability and the legal boundaries of modern conflict.

Info at your fingertips

What is Admiral Bradley accused of authorizing?

He is accused of authorizing a follow-on missile strike that killed two survivors from an initial engagement. The legality of attacking individuals who may have been incapacitated is under investigation.

What did Secretary Hegseth allegedly order?

Allegations suggested Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a “kill them all” or “give no quarter” order. Admiral Bradley directly denied receiving any such command from the Secretary during his congressional testimony.

How have lawmakers reacted to the classified video?

Reactions are starkly partisan. Republicans call the force justified, while Democrats found the footage deeply troubling. Representative Jim Himes called it one of the most disturbing things he’s seen in public service.

What are the legal concerns surrounding this strike?

International humanitarian law prohibits attacking combatants who are out of action. If the survivors were helpless or surrendering, the strike could constitute a war crime. Experts are analyzing the precise circumstances.

What happens next in the congressional investigation?

Democrats are demanding the full strike video, all written orders, and related White House legal memos. Obtaining these documents may be challenging as Republicans control the key oversight committees.