Earl Charles Spencer has made a stunning new claim about his sister’s death. He directly connects the BBC’s 1995 Panorama interview to the events leading to her fatal 1997 car crash in Paris. Spencer alleges the deceit used to secure the sit-down left Diana isolated and unprotected. This accusation comes years after a BBC investigation confirmed the journalist’s misconduct.

The internal BBC inquiry found journalist Martin Bashir used fake bank statements to gain access. This new statement from her brother provides a chilling perspective on the tragedy’s chain of events. It underscores the lasting pain caused by the scandal for Diana’s family and close aides.
Forged Documents and Justified Paranoia
According to Spencer’s account to People, Bashir showed him forged financial records. These documents falsely suggested members of Diana’s staff were being paid to spy on her. The deception created a climate of intense fear and suspicion within her inner circle.
Patrick Jephson, Diana’s former private secretary, confirmed the devastating impact. He told People the forgeries made Diana believe her trusted team was the enemy. This manufactured distrust, he explained, led her to reject official protection and rely on less competent security.
A Broader Impact on Royal History and Media Ethics
The fallout from the interview extended far beyond Diana’s personal turmoil. It publicly shattered the facade of her marriage to then-Prince Charles. The broadcast included her famous line about there being “three of us” in the marriage, confirming his affair with Camilla Parker Bowles.
The BBC has publicly apologized for the “unacceptable” methods used. Martin Bashir also apologized for the “stupid” action of mocking up bank statements. Despite these apologies, Spencer’s latest comments show the deep, unresolved wounds for Diana’s family. The scandal continues to raise serious questions about media ethics and accountability.
The direct link drawn by her brother adds a profound new layer to the tragic narrative of Princess Diana’s life and death. It suggests the consequences of the BBC interview scandal were even more devastating than previously known.
Thought you’d like to know-
What did Martin Bashir do to get the interview?
He used forged bank statements. These fake documents falsely showed that Diana’s aides were being paid to spy on her, creating a false narrative to gain access and her trust.
Has the BBC apologized for the Panorama interview?
Yes, the BBC has accepted the findings of its internal investigation in full. The corporation issued a public apology for its part in the deceitful tactics used to secure the conversation with Princess Diana.
What did Princess Diana say in the Panorama interview?
She gave candid details about her failing marriage to Prince Charles. The most famous quote was her remark about “there being three of us in this marriage,” which publicly confirmed his affair.
How did Earl Spencer find out about the deception?
Martin Bashir showed the forged bank statements directly to Earl Spencer. This was a key part of the plan to win Spencer’s trust so he would introduce the journalist to his sister.
Why is this story in the news again now?
Earl Spencer recently gave a new interview to People magazine. In it, he made a direct connection between the deceptive interview and the circumstances that led to Diana’s fatal car crash in Paris.
জুমবাংলা নিউজ সবার আগে পেতে Follow করুন জুমবাংলা গুগল নিউজ, জুমবাংলা টুইটার , জুমবাংলা ফেসবুক, জুমবাংলা টেলিগ্রাম এবং সাবস্ক্রাইব করুন জুমবাংলা ইউটিউব চ্যানেলে।



