Sabrina Carpenter Condemns White House for Using Her Song in Deportation Video

Grammy-winning singer Sabrina Carpenter publicly criticized the White House on Tuesday. She objected to a video posted by the Trump administration. The video used her song “Juno” to promote its immigration agenda.

The singer stated her permission was not sought. She called the video “evil and disgusting” in a social media post. The incident highlights ongoing tension between artists and political use of their work.

White House Issues Sharp Rebuttal to Singer’s Criticism

The White House responded directly to Carpenter’s condemnation. An official spoke to Entertainment Weekly about the situation. The response was framed as a “Short n’ Sweet message” for the artist.

“We won’t apologize for deporting dangerous criminal illegal murderers, rapists, and pedophiles from our country,” the representative stated. The official also quoted lyrics from another Carpenter single, “Manchild.” This underscored the administration’s defiant stance on the policy.

The exchange marks a significant escalation. It moves beyond a simple copyright complaint to a direct ideological clash. The administration used the artist’s own album and song titles to structure its retort.

Artists Continue to Clash With Political Use of Music

Sabrina Carpenter is not the first artist to confront this administration. Several musicians have objected to their work being used politically. This pattern has defined much of the current political climate.

Earlier this year, Kenny Loggins demanded removal of his song “Danger Zone” from a Trump campaign video. He stated he would have denied permission for its use. Loggins emphasized music should unite, not divide.

In November, Olivia Rodrigo also called out the White House. Her song “All-American B***h” soundtracked a video about self-deportation. She told the administration not to use her music for “racist, hateful propaganda.”

These disputes raise questions about copyright and moral rights. Artists argue their creative expression is being co-opted. Political entities continue to use popular music as a messaging tool.

The conflict between Sabrina Carpenter and the White House reveals a deeper cultural rift. It shows how music becomes a battlefield for political ideology. This debate over artistic control versus political messaging is far from over.

Thought you’d like to know

Which Sabrina Carpenter song did the White House use?

The administration used the song “Juno.” It is a track from her album ‘Short n’ Sweet.’ The video promoted deportation operations.

Have other artists had similar disputes?

Yes. Kenny Loggins and Olivia Rodrigo have both publicly condemned the White House. They objected to the use of their songs in political videos this year.

How did the White House justify using the music?

A representative defended the video’s message. They stated they would not apologize for deporting individuals convicted of serious crimes. The response was reported by Entertainment Weekly.

What was Sabrina Carpenter’s direct reaction?

She called the video “evil and disgusting” on social media. Carpenter demanded her music not be used to benefit what she called an “inhumane agenda.”