Sabrina Carpenter Slams White House Over Unauthorized Use of Song in ICE Video

Pop star Sabrina Carpenter has publicly condemned the White House. Her hit song was used in a government video promoting ICE deportations. The incident occurred this week and sparked immediate backlash.

The singer took to social media to voice her strong disapproval. She demanded her music never be tied to what she called an “inhumane agenda.” This places her among many artists who have clashed with the administration.

Artist Denounces “Evil” Video as Administration Defends Action

The controversial video was posted by the White House. It featured footage of Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. Sabrina Carpenter’s track played prominently in the background.

The caption directly referenced Carpenter’s viral concert moments. It read, “Have you ever tried this one? Bye-bye.” The singer responded swiftly and with clear anger on platform X.

“This video is evil and disgusting,” Carpenter stated. She explicitly told the administration not to involve her or her music. Her statement drew swift support from fans and fellow artists online.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson defended the post. According to Reuters reporting, Jackson said they would not apologize for deporting individuals described as dangerous criminals. The response intensified the public dispute.

A Growing Chorus of Artists Object to Political Use of Their Music

Sabrina Carpenter is not the first artist to object. This pattern has persisted for several years. Major acts from different genres have issued similar cease-and-desist demands.

Earlier this year, Kenny Loggins spoke out about his song “Danger Zone” being used. Global superstar Beyoncé previously demanded her song “Freedom” be stopped. Other notable names include ABBA, Olivia Rodrigo, and the Foo Fighters.

These incidents highlight a tension between political messaging and artistic copyright. Artists fiercely protect their work from unintended political associations. The legal and ethical lines remain a topic of significant debate.

The impact is felt in the court of public opinion. It can alienate segments of an artist’s fanbase. For the administration, it generates media attention but also significant criticism.

Sabrina Carpenter’s firm stance reinforces a clear boundary for artists. Her demand to separate her music from the White House’s ICE video reflects a broader industry fight. This clash between pop culture and political messaging shows no signs of ending.

Info at your fingertips

Why did Sabrina Carpenter speak out against the White House?

She objected to her song being used in a video showcasing ICE deportations. Carpenter called the video “evil and disgusting” and said her music should not benefit an “inhumane agenda.”

Have other artists had similar issues?

Yes, many have. This year, Kenny Loggins objected to the use of “Danger Zone.” In past years, Beyoncé, ABBA, Olivia Rodrigo, and the Foo Fighters have all asked the administration to stop using their songs.

How did the White House respond to Carpenter?

A spokeswoman defended the video’s message. She stated the administration would not apologize for deporting individuals described as dangerous criminal offenders.

What is the potential impact for an artist in this situation?

It can create a political association they did not choose. This often leads to public disputes and can alienate parts of their fanbase depending on their views.

Was the song used with permission?

Typically, political campaigns or entities secure licenses through performance rights organizations. However, artists can still object on moral grounds, which is what happened here.