Srikkanth Blasts Shubman Gill’s Asia Cup Selection: “Where Does He Come In Suddenly?”

The Indian cricket selection committee faces intense scrutiny as former chief selector Krishnamachari Srikkanth launched a scathing critique against mounting pressure to include Test captain Shubman Gill in India’s Asia Cup T20 squad. With the continental tournament squad announcement imminent, Srikkanth questioned the logic behind Gill’s potential recall, highlighting the 25-year-old’s prolonged absence from the T20I setup since July 2024.

Why is Shubman Gill’s Asia Cup Selection Contentious?

Gill, India’s newly appointed Test skipper, last represented the country in T20Is during the Sri Lanka series over a year ago. Since then, selectors have strategically focused his development on ODIs and the longer format, culminating in his recent Test captaincy appointment following a standout series in England. Speculation about Gill’s elevation to ODI leadership has further fueled debates about his sudden reintegration into the T20 squad for September’s Asia Cup.

Srikkanth, who chaired India’s selection panel from 2008–2012, dismissed these calls as disruptive. He emphasized that Gill wasn’t part of India’s triumphant 2024 T20 World Cup campaign and pointedly noted his omission from the recent T20I series against England. “He was not even in the T20I team against England,” Srikkanth stated on his YouTube channel, underscoring the inconsistency in selection philosophy.

Srikkanth Demands Continuity Over Disruption

The 65-year-old icon warned that Gill’s inclusion would unfairly displace emerging talents like Sai Sudharsan, Yashasvi Jaiswal, or Vaibhav Suryavanshi – players who’ve been integral to India’s current T20 framework. “If Shubman Gill was the captain [in T20Is], he would have automatically come into the playing XI… But Gill wasn’t part of the T20 World Cup. Where does he come in suddenly?” Srikkanth argued, advocating for reward-based continuity over reactive changes.

While Gill boasts impressive T20 credentials – including an IPL 2023 Orange Cap with 890 runs for Gujarat Titans and a career T20I strike rate of 139.27 – Srikkanth contends past achievements shouldn’t override recent selection trajectories. His stance reflects a broader tension between reputation-based selections and consistent meritocracy in Indian cricket.

The Leadership Conundrum Complicating Selection

Gill’s successful Test captaincy debut in England has intensified the discourse, with some observers pushing for his leadership extension to white-ball cricket. However, Srikkanth’s intervention highlights the risks of conflating format-specific form. Gill’s T20I record (578 runs in 21 matches) remains solid but hasn’t been tested internationally since mid-2024, while incumbents like Jaiswal have solidified their roles.

Must Know

Q: When did Shubman Gill last play T20I cricket?
A: Gill’s most recent T20I appearance was against Sri Lanka in July 2024. Selectors subsequently prioritized his involvement in ODIs and Tests, culminating in his appointment as Test captain.

Q: What is Krishnamachari Srikkanth’s main objection to Gill’s selection?
A: Srikkanth emphasizes disruptive inconsistency, noting Gill’s absence from India’s 2024 T20 World Cup squad and recent England T20Is. He advocates rewarding current performers over reinstating players abruptly.

Q: How has Shubman Gill performed in T20 leagues?
A: Gill excelled in IPL 2023, winning the Orange Cap with 890 runs for Gujarat Titans. His overall T20I record includes 578 runs at 139.27 across 21 matches.

Q: Who could lose their spot if Gill joins the Asia Cup squad?
A: Srikkanth specifically mentioned young batters Sai Sudharsan, Yashasvi Jaiswal, and Vaibhav Suryavanshi as players whose positions would be threatened by Gill’s inclusion.

Q: Is Gill likely to become India’s ODI captain?
A: While speculation exists about Gill’s potential ODI leadership elevation, no official announcement has been made. His Test captaincy appointment fuels this discussion.

As Asia Cup selection looms, the Shubman Gill debate underscores cricket’s eternal tension between reputation and relevance – a controversy demanding selectors choose wisely between established stars and proven continuity.