A Republican effort to censure Democratic Representative Stacey Plaskett has narrowly failed. The vote in the US House of Representatives ended 213 to 214. The motion was tied to newly released documents showing text exchanges with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The House Freedom Caucus led the censure push. This occurred just after the House unanimously voted to release more files related to the Epstein case. According to the Washington Post, the texts were sent during a 2019 Congressional hearing.
Plaskett’s Office Confirms Contact Amid Partisan Attacks
A spokesperson for Plaskett acknowledged the contact. They stated the congresswoman was responding to widespread messages during the hearing. These included advice, support, and what she termed “partisan vitriol.”
The office emphasized her background as a former prosecutor. She was seeking information to get to the truth. The texts were characterized as unsolicited contact from Epstein, not an ongoing relationship.
Plaskett serves as a non-voting delegate for the US Virgin Islands. This jurisdiction includes the island where Epstein maintained a residence. The connection placed her in Epstein’s sphere due to her official role.
Broader Political Impact of the Narrow Vote
The single-vote margin highlights deep political divisions. The censure effort followed a broader push for transparency in the Epstein case. The failed vote ends this particular probe but keeps the scandal in public discourse.
The outcome is a political victory for Plaskett and her allies. It prevents formal condemnation from the House. However, the association with the Epstein files remains a focal point for her critics.
The episode shows how historical connections to controversial figures can resurface. It influences political strategy and public perception. The narrow vote ensures the story will have lasting political repercussions.
The Stacey Plaskett Epstein censure vote demonstrates the ongoing political fallout from the case. Its failure by one vote underscores the intensely divided nature of the current House. This event ensures the Epstein scandal remains a potent force in American politics.
Thought you’d like to know
What was the Stacey Plaskett censure vote about?
The vote was a motion to formally censure the representative. It concerned her text exchanges with Jeffrey Epstein. The measure failed by a single vote, 213 to 214.
What is Stacey Plaskett’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein?
She represents the US Virgin Islands, where Epstein owned property. Released documents showed he texted her during a 2019 hearing. Her office states she merely responded to his unsolicited contact.
What was the outcome of the censure vote?
The motion to censure Representative Plaskett was defeated. The final tally was 213 in favor and 214 against. This one-vote margin ended the immediate effort.
How did Plaskett’s office explain the Epstein texts?
Her spokesperson said she received many texts during the hearing. They framed Epstein’s message as “partisan vitriol.” Her response was described as part of her fact-finding role.
Why does the US Virgin Islands connection matter?
Epstein’s private island is located within her congressional district. This created a jurisdictional link. It explains why he might have attempted to contact her.
iNews covers the latest and most impactful stories across
entertainment,
business,
sports,
politics, and
technology,
from AI breakthroughs to major global developments. Stay updated with the trends shaping our world. For news tips, editorial feedback, or professional inquiries, please email us at
[email protected].
Get the latest news first by following us on
Google News,
Twitter,
Facebook,
Telegram
, and subscribe to our
YouTube channel.



