In a seismic shift for U.S. democracy, former President Donald Trump declared an unprecedented federal takeover of state election systems via Truth Social on August 18, 2025. Announcing plans to sign an executive order eliminating mail-in ballots and electronic voting machines before the 2026 midterms, Trump asserted states are “merely an agent” of the federal government in vote-counting—a claim constitutional scholars call a dangerous power grab.

How Will Trump’s Proposed Election Changes Impact Voter Access?

Trump’s sweeping executive order—dubbed “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections”—would:

Ban mail-in ballots nationwide, despite 43% of voters using them in 2024 (U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 2025).
Decertify electronic voting machines used in 39 states, requiring replacements meeting new federal standards.
Mandate proof of citizenship for voter registration, overturning current state-level ID laws.

Election security experts universally refute Trump’s fraud claims. Dr. Pamela Smith, President of Verified Voting, stated: “Mail ballots have no proven fraud risk. Eliminating them disenfranchises military personnel, seniors, and disabled voters.” The Brennan Center for Justice notes U.S. elections face stricter audits than countries like Germany or Canada—both permitting mail voting.

Legal Firestorm Over Federal Overreach

Trump’s assertion that “states must do what the President tells them” sparked immediate backlash. Nineteen states sued the administration in August 2025, arguing the order violates:

The Electoral Clause (Article I, Section 4), granting states primary election authority.
The 10th Amendment’s state sovereignty protections.
“We’re witnessing a constitutional crisis,” said Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe. “No president has claimed unilateral power to void state election laws.”

A federal court already blocked Trump’s March 2025 order requiring citizenship proof, citing “irreparable harm to voting rights” (State of California v. Trump, 2025).

The Precedent: March 2025’s Contested Order

Trump’s earlier election actions foreshadowed this escalation. His March 2025 executive order:

Directed the Election Assistance Commission to decertify voting machines lacking hand-count backup.
Banned mail ballots received after Election Day, affecting 560,000 valid votes in 2024.
No existing machines meet Trump’s new standards, potentially forcing states to spend $4.7 billion on replacements or resort to error-prone hand counts (MIT Election Lab).

Bolded Final Paragraph:
Trump’s election executive order—framed as “restoring honesty”—threatens to dismantle foundational state authority, disenfranchise vulnerable voters, and ignite legal warfare. With 19 states already challenging his voting restrictions, citizens must demand Congress uphold electoral safeguards. Contact your representatives to protect free and fair elections.

Must Know

Q: What’s the basis for Trump’s mail-in ballot ban?
A: Trump claims without evidence that mail voting enables fraud. Nonpartisan studies (Heritage Foundation, 2024) show only 0.00006% of 2024 mail ballots were fraudulent.

Q: Can Trump legally override state election laws?
A: Unlikely. The Constitution delegates election administration to states. Past rulings (Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council, 2013) reaffirm state authority.

Q: How would eliminating voting machines impact elections?
A: Hand-counting all ballots could delay results by weeks and increase errors. Rhode Island’s 2023 hand-count trial had a 12% inaccuracy rate (Caltech/MIT Voting Project).

Q: What’s the status of Trump’s March 2025 voting order?
A: Key provisions are blocked by courts. The citizenship-proof requirement was halted in June 2025; the mail-ballot deadline rule faces injunctions in 9 states.

Sources: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (2025), Brennan Center for Justice, Caltech/MIT Voting Project, Heritage Foundation (2024), State of California v. Trump (2025), Verified Voting.
Visuals: Embed interactive map of states using targeted voting machines; bar chart comparing mail ballot usage by demographic.