Trump’s AI Executive Order Ignites Hollywood Battle Over Regulation

President Donald Trump signed a major executive order on December 11. The order aims to block states from regulating artificial intelligence. This move directly impacts Hollywood and other creative industries nationwide. It seeks to create a single national policy for AI development.

The White House stated the goal is to sustain U.S. dominance in AI. Attorney General Pam Bondi will lead a new AI Litigation Task Force. This group will find and challenge existing state AI laws. According to NBC News, Trump argued that needing 50 different state approvals would stifle innovation.

Industry Fears Over Unchecked AI Use

Hollywood’s concerns about artificial intelligence are growing rapidly. Professionals worry about copyright issues and job displacement. There are also fears about losing control over personal likeness and voice. The human element of creativity is seen as being at risk.

This follows news of an AI-generated actress named Tilly Norwood. She was created by Particle6 Productions. Reports suggested she was in talks for representation by a real talent agency. This development sparked immediate backlash from industry unions and actors.

SAG-AFTRA released a strong statement against the AI creation. The union said Norwood is not an actor but a computer-generated character. It emphasized that the AI was trained on the work of real performers without their consent. The statement concluded that audiences are not interested in content devoid of human experience.

A Unified Front of Hollywood Criticism

Prominent actors have publicly condemned the rise of AI performers. Jameela Jamil called the concept “deeply disturbing.” Actress Mara Wilson questioned why real young women couldn’t be hired instead. She referenced the hundreds of living women whose faces may have been used to composite the AI.

Morgan Freeman offered a blunt assessment. The Oscar winner stated plainly that “nobody likes” Tilly Norwood because she’s “not real.” He predicted the concept would not work well in movies or television. Freeman highlighted the inherent conflict with unions whose job is to protect working actors.

The executive order frames the issue as a national competitiveness priority. It claims excessive state regulation thwarts American innovation. However, for Hollywood, the fight is about preserving artistry and livelihoods. The clash between federal policy and creative industry safeguards is now set.

This AI executive order creates a significant new front in Hollywood’s ongoing battle for protection. The outcome will shape how technology integrates into creative fields. The conflict between innovation and artistic integrity is now a federal matter.

Info at your fingertips

What did Trump’s executive order do?

It was signed on December 11. The order aims to prevent individual states from creating their own AI regulations. It establishes a national policy framework instead.

Who is leading the legal effort for this order?

Attorney General Pam Bondi will lead the new AI Litigation Task Force. This group is tasked with identifying and challenging existing state AI laws in court.

Why is Hollywood concerned about AI?

The industry fears job loss for actors and crews. There are major concerns about copyright and the unauthorized use of personal likenesses. Many believe AI cannot replicate genuine human creativity and emotion.

What was the Tilly Norwood controversy?

Norwood is an AI-generated actress created by Particle6. Reports of her seeking real talent agency representation sparked outrage. Unions and stars criticized it as a threat to human performers.

Can states still regulate AI now?

The executive order seeks to block them, but legal challenges are expected. The new task force will actively fight state laws. The ultimate authority may be decided by the courts.

What is the main argument for the order?

The White House argues a single national rule is needed for U.S. companies to compete globally. It states that 50 different state rules would be too burdensome for innovators.