Why Congress Still Profits: The Unkept Promise to Ban Insider Stock Trading

For years, Americans across the political spectrum have demanded one simple reform: ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks. Fueled by outrage over politicians profiting from non-public information, this push united progressives and conservatives—even earning a “drain the swamp” endorsement from Donald Trump during his campaigns. Yet despite overwhelming public support, legislative efforts repeatedly collapse before reaching a full vote.

The current law, the STOCK Act of 2012, passed after revelations lawmakers profited during crises like the 2008 financial collapse (MSNBC, August 2025). It aimed to apply insider trading rules to Congress and mandate timely trade disclosures. But investigations reveal systemic failures: dozens of lawmakers and families violated rules through late disclosures or suspicious trades. One glaring case saw Rep. Mike Kelly’s (R-PA) wife buy steel stock just after he learned of pending government aid for that company—an ethics panel later urged divestment, but Kelly declared, “We got completely exonerated” (Congressional Ethics Report, 2023).

How Does Insider Trading Persist in Congress?

The STOCK Act’s enforcement mechanisms are toothless. A 2021 Wall Street Journal investigation found 72 lawmakers violated disclosure rules, while a 2022 New York Times analysis showed politicians routinely traded in industries overseen by their committees. Penalties are minimal—fines average just $200 for late filings—creating a culture of impunity. Critics argue the law’s loopholes allow “legalized corruption,” with some senators reporting trades hundreds of days late without consequence (OpenSecrets, 2024).

Trump’s Silence Speaks Volumes

Despite branding stock-trading bans as central to “draining the swamp,” Trump has taken no meaningful action to advance legislation during or after his presidency. His administration saw over 200 STOCK Act violations, yet he prioritized tax cuts benefiting wealthy investors (Tax Policy Center, 2023). Meanwhile, Trump’s own wealth surged—notably through controversial ventures like his $2.4 billion Truth Social SPAC deal and cryptocurrency promotions (SEC Filing, April 2025). This disconnect fuels public cynicism, as voters see “drain the swamp” rhetoric overshadowed by expanding political wealth.

Can Reform Ever Succeed?

Bipartisan bills like the BAN Congressional Stock Trading Act gain co-sponsors but stall in committee. Reform advocates argue real change requires:

• Mandatory blind trusts for all congressional assets
• Real-time disclosure with automated penalties
• Banning trades by spouses and dependent children
  Opponents claim such rules deter qualified candidates, though polls show 86% of voters support bans (Pew Research, January 2025). With elections approaching, activists pressure leadership to allow floor votes—but insiders privately concede reforms threaten too many colleagues’ portfolios.

The stalling of a stock trading ban underscores a painful truth: until voters demand accountability at the ballot box, politicians will keep profiting from the very systems they oversee. This isn’t just broken promises—it’s a betrayal of public trust. If you’re tired of business-as-usual in Washington, contact your representatives and demand they prioritize ethics over self-enrichment.

---

Must Know

Q: What is the STOCK Act?
A: Passed in 2012, it prohibits Congressional insider trading and requires timely disclosure of stock trades. However, lax enforcement and minimal fines ($200 average) render it ineffective against violations.

Q: How often do lawmakers break trading rules?
A: Over 100 violations occurred between 2020-2024, including late disclosures exceeding 1,000 days in some cases (CRP, 2024). At least 50 lawmakers held stocks conflicting with committee duties.

Q: Why hasn’t Trump stopped Congressional trading?
A: Despite pledging to “drain the swamp,” Trump never prioritized stock ban legislation. His administration saw record violations, and his personal wealth grew through investments like cryptocurrency ventures.

Q: Do voters support banning stock trades?
A: Yes—86% of Americans favor bans, including 90% of Democrats and 81% of Republicans (Pew Research, 2025). Reform bills exist but lack leadership support for floor votes.

Q: Which politicians oppose trading bans?
A: Key committee chairs from both parties resist reforms. Critics argue opposition correlates with personal stock market gains exceeding congressional salaries.

Q: How can citizens force change?
A: Advocates urge voters to demand co-sponsorship of bills like H.R.1139 and support primary challengers to opponents of reform.