A University of Oklahoma student failed a psychology assignment after citing the Bible. The incident has sparked a major debate over academic standards and religious expression. The university has now placed the instructor on administrative leave.The controversy involves student Samantha Fulnecky and instructor Mel Curth. According to Reuters, Fulnecky submitted a paper discussing gender roles. She used biblical references as her primary source of evidence.
University of Oklahoma Grading Controversy Explained
The assignment was for a psychology course. Students were asked to react to an article on societal gender expectations. The prompt required the use of empirical evidence and scientific reasoning.Fulnecky’s essay argued for traditional gender roles. She cited the Bible to support her arguments. Instructor Mel Curth gave the paper a score of zero out of 25 points.The feedback noted the paper did not meet academic standards. Curth stated the essay used personal ideology over empirical evidence. It also cited passages the instructor found offensive toward marginalized groups.

Institutional Response and Broader Impact
The University of Oklahoma responded quickly. University leaders initiated a formal review process. They have been in regular communication with the student.A formal grade appeal was conducted. The university ensured the student suffered no academic harm. The instructor was placed on administrative leave pending a full investigation.The case raises questions about academic freedom. It also highlights tensions between religious expression and scientific coursework. Universities nationwide are watching the outcome closely.Turning Point USA’s Oklahoma chapter publicly supported the student. The group called for the instructor’s dismissal. They argued the grading suppressed conservative viewpoints in the classroom.
LeBron James Calls Nikola Jokić the Most Dominant Offensive Player He’s Ever Faced
This University of Oklahoma grading controversy underscores the ongoing challenges educational institutions face in balancing free speech with academic rigor. The final outcome will likely influence similar cases across the country.
Thought you’d like to know
What was the University of Oklahoma student’s essay about?
The essay was a reaction paper for a psychology course. It addressed societal expectations surrounding gender. The student used biblical references to argue for traditional roles.
Why did the instructor give the essay a zero?
The instructor stated the essay failed to use empirical evidence. It relied heavily on personal ideology and religious texts. The feedback also cited offensive language about marginalized groups.
What action has the university taken?
The university placed the instructor on administrative leave. It conducted a formal grade appeal process. Officials ensured the student faced no academic penalty from the incident.
Who is supporting the student in this case?
The Oklahoma chapter of Turning Point USA is supporting the student. The conservative group shared the story on social media. They are calling for the instructor’s dismissal.
What is the core issue in this controversy?
The core issue balances religious expression with academic standards. It questions how personal beliefs fit in scientific coursework. The case involves free speech and educational requirements.
iNews covers the latest and most impactful stories across
entertainment,
business,
sports,
politics, and
technology,
from AI breakthroughs to major global developments. Stay updated with the trends shaping our world. For news tips, editorial feedback, or professional inquiries, please email us at
[email protected].
Get the latest news and Breaking News first by following us on
Google News,
Twitter,
Facebook,
Telegram
, and subscribe to our
YouTube channel.



